the house of YAD             APRIL 2003

Mango Tree University    Words From Stephen    Yard Culture    YAD Chat    Poetry Corner    U.S. Top Stories    Guestbook    

 • Archives
 • Support Us
 • In Da Kitchen w/D
 • YAD Mail
 • YAD Personals
 • Contact us
 • YadXpress
 • YADWorld

 • U.S. Top Stories
 • Europe Today
 • Your Health
 • Int'l News
 • Movie Review
 • Inside Africa
 • Jokes
 • Sex N Da News
Please enter your user name:
Please enter your password:
Trouble Logging-in
Forgot Your Password

If you have not yet signed up for your e-mail address at this site, you can do so here. So what if you have another e-mail address? It's free! Sign Up Now!

INTERNET FUNNIES

A man was driving down a local street one day and approached a stop sign. He barely slowed down and ran right through the stop sign after glancing for traffic. What the driver didn't know was that a policeman was watching the intersection. The policeman pulled out after him and stopped the car two blocks away.

Policeman: "License, registration and proof of insurance please."

Driver: "Before I give it to you, tell me what the heck you stopped me for, man."

Policeman: "Watch your tone sir; you ran the stop sign back there!!"

Driver: "Man, I slowed down, what the heck is the difference!?!"

The police officer pulled out his night stick and began smashing it over the man's head and shoulders.

Policeman: "Now, do you want me to just slow down or stop!!!?


Live Chat
Join other visitors and chat live...

Four men were out golfing and discussing how each convinced their wife to let them play golf every morning.

1st guy: I had to buy my wife a BMW to let me play golf daily.

2nd guy: You got off cheap! I had to buy my wife a BMW and a mink coat.

3rd guy: You both got off dirt cheap! I had to buy my wife the BMW, mink coat and a diamond necklace.

4th guy: Ha! I didn't have to buy my wife a single thing! Every morning when I wake up, I lean over in bed, nudge my wife and ask, “Intercourse or golf course?” She instantly replies, “Don't forget to take your sweater.”

He Said She Said

He said... I don't know why you wear a bra; you've got nothing to put in it.
She said...You wear briefs, don't you?

He said... 'Two inches more, and I would be king'
She said...'Two inches less, and you'd be queen'

Shock and Awe Or Shocking and Awful?

Taking the biggest gamble of his presidency, President George Bush gave the order and since then we have been at war. He ordered Saddam and his sons to leave Iraq or face the consequences. According to the latest polls, a significant majority (more than 70%) of Americans now believe that there should be war and backs the President.

As I correctly noted last month, it was definitely not a matter of if but when we would go to war. President Bush was not going to hear otherwise from anyone. No matter what Saddam did it would not have been enough for President Bush.

Expressions such as "shock and awe," "route hurricane" and "Operation Freedom" are the latest terms to be added to our vocabulary.

Now that we are at war, we just have to support the troops. However, supporting our troops does not mean that those of us against the war can no longer voice our opinion. It also does not mean that we support President Bush's decision.

I recently came across an article in the Washington Post where the President’s bully tactics were examined. I was not surprised. President Bush is the COMMANDER IN CHIEF and dare no one not bow to his way. His presidency troubles me. The way he came to power bothers me. His style of governing bothers me. The way he talks bothers me. His words bother me.

But I have come to realize that many people like, no sorry, love President Bush. They say he is HONEST. He does not lie to the American people. He is not like former President Bill Clinton. When I hear that argument I can see where they are coming from. They agree that the economy was better during the Clinton years but that they just couldn’t stand our former Pres. Then many of the war supporters do not have the facts right. They believe that Saddam is responsible for 9/11. They believe that Saddam and Osama are friends. They believe all sorts of things.

I tend to agree with the poster who sums it up best for me in the forum on this website. I would bet anything if former President Clinton went for a full-scale war in 1999 and asked for approval from the U.N. he would have gotten it. Even France would have been on board. Simply put, the world's perception of him as well as his motives would be different. Bush's arrogant cowboy attitude has left American foreign policy in shambles. From the moment he was selected, he made it clear he was unilaterally pulling out of treaties even his father honored. The lone John Wayne attitude may work on a ranch in Texas, but it will not fly with the rest of the world. I guess his daddy didn't tell him he can catch more flies with honey (and a killer smile) than you can with vinegar (and cowboy boots).

However, I will be the first to admit that President Bush is gutsy. He has his own convictions in which he firmly believes. Shrugging off the United Nations and his critics, at home and abroad, he defied them all and with his coalition of the willing has managed to bring freedom to a nation under the control of a brutal leader and regime. Will it now matter whether or not weapons of mass control are found? Or is it just enough that Saddam is no longer leader of Iraq? Either might be acceptable since there were so many reasons given for going to war.

Then we are bombarded with the WAR movie on every T.V. channel. The war is beamed right into our living rooms and bedrooms 24/7. What the ****!!!! I have had enough already. Everything has obviously changed. The two sides to this part of the war could be that the U.S. is glamorizing this war or maybe the U.S. just wants to convince the rest of the world that this is a JUST and FAIR war.

One thing is certain and that is the U.S.A. cannot boast of its prowess. To do so would be false. After all, we are fighting people in pick up trucks. We have sent an entire army, the most powerful army on earth for one man. At the moment the only country with weapons of mass destruction and the only country using it seems to be the United States.

What past American presidents, past European leaders and other world leaders took over half a century to build, George Bush has undone in less than three years. Now the United Nations is left as a joke. It might no longer be a viable international organization. Maybe the fundamental flaw with the organization is its veto arrangement. NATO might also have been damaged. One just has to hope that the damage is not irreparable.

We will have to wait and see if billions of dollars and years later we won’t regret this time in our history. I hope the United States can mend its trans-atlantic relationship with its European friends. I also hope that the Iraqi people will be "liberated" and not be ruled by the U.S.A.

The first report regarding the prisoners of war were troubling and we heard the U.S. Secretary of Defence saying that the Iraqi action vis-a-vis the POWs was illegal under the Geneva Convention. Was he being serious? Many would argue that under international law it was illegal for the United States to attack Iraq in the first place. Mr. Secretary, we cannot have our cake and eat it too.

Critics are asking how the United States can demand the protection of the Geneva Conventions for U.S. soldiers captured in Iraq while not fully complying with the conventions in American treatment of terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Well I am off now. I am going to have some freedom fries and a chicken sandwich. May God be with us all.

Counting Down To Graduation May 21, 2003 -- The End of Law School

BONJOUR  PARIS!
paris1.JPG (57748 bytes)

CARIBBEAN CORNER
imge.jpg (27276 bytes)

Click for New York City, New York Forecast


********************************************************

"The stool tells you a lot about your colon health. If it's dark brown in color, and it sinks, and it stinks, that's not good. And don't feel bad, that's the way most people are."


PlanetOut Personals

" People have reported more energy, less allergies, clearing of acne, cessation of migraines, and many other results, not to mention restored regularity. When your body is void of old, poisonous toxins that are constantly being reabsorbed through the colon walls, it can begin to heal again."

Click to read more health news--updated daily

Time to be cleansed

Let me ask you this...which is worse:

A. The engine on your Lexus freezes up at 160,000 miles instead of 300,000. You take a financial hit and you are forced to buy a Camry this time.

B. You start bleeding during bowel movements. You go to the doctor and get poked, prodded, X-ray'd, biopsied, etc. and 3 days later you get a call for a consultation. The doctor informs you that you have advanced colon cancer at 45 years old. You have anywhere from 6 months to 5 years left to live. He tells you it's time to get your house in order because you'll be checking out soon. Chemotherapy starts today.

This can be horrible but it happens everyday. In the prime of one's life, one can be faced with having to say goodbye, leaving behind spouse, children and other loved ones, wondering what just hit them.

Why do you brush your teeth? Are your teeth falling out right now? For most of us, we do it so we won't need false teeth and Fixodent down the road...right? We want to be able to eat apples. Hey, I agree with that. Natural teeth are great.

But have you ever seen someone who was forced to endure a colonescopy? Or someone who now will be spending the rest of their life carrying a bag around?

Incredibly, this is an area where even the staunchest MD's AGREE!!

This subject is not even up for debate. It's a proven fact. The problem is, most people are not doing anything about it. Please don't be one of them.

****WARNING***** The next section of this email contains graphic material which may not be suitable for squeamish individuals.

Let's talk stools.

The stool tells you a lot about your colon health. If it's dark brown in color, and it sinks, and it stinks, that's not good. And don't feel bad, that's the way most people are. What you want to see is light brown color, which means it's full of fresh bile from the liver, very mild odor, and a stool that floats. We're talking low-density here folks. The more compaction you have the darker the color and the faster it sinks. Compaction is not good. Also, moving bowels should be SIMPLE. If the veins are popping out of your neck and you feel like your doing the bench press, you NEED to cleanse your colon.

When you do the cleanse, after the first few days, you will know you are cleansing when you see the above good stuff happening, and you are eliminating at least 2-3 times per day.

Cleansing your colon is not a long process. You may be very surprised at some of the benefits you will receive besides just losing 1-5 lbs of crap from your body and brightening your future health.

People have reported more energy, less allergies, clearing of acne, cessation of migraines, and many other results, not to mention restored regularity. When your body is void of old, poisonous toxins that are constantly being reabsorbed through the colon walls, it can begin to heal again. And when the colon walls are clean, the good nutrients from your food and supplements can be absorbed again. You will be thrilled with the results.

At this point you are either nauseated thinking about what is inside your own colon, or you're ready to do something about cleaning it out.

Want more info? Consult your doctor today.

Life is short... Live each day as if it were your last!

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Sex/Privacy & Race.

Before long, the U.S. Supreme Court will render its decisions in two cases it heard late March and early April 2003. The decisions will affect all our lives regardless of sexual orientation/preference and race. If you have not been following, let me give you the background.

Case One Lawrence v. Texas

  • It all began five years ago when a neighbor reported a “weapons disturbance” at the home of John G. Lawrence. When police arrived they only found two men having sex. Lawrence and another man, Tyron Garner, were held overnight in jail and later fined $200 each for violating the state’s Homosexual Conduct law. The neighbor was later convicted of filing a false police report. In Lawrence v. Texas, two gay men say the state of Texas deprived them of privacy rights and equal protection under the law when they were arrested in 1998 for having sex in a Houston home. The case is now before the US Supreme Court. Oral arguments were held on March 26, 2003. A decision is expected at the end of June or beginning of July, 2003.

    For more on this story (I am too tired to write anymore)See

    The Supreme Court Tries Sodomy and Discovers that Texas is Confused about it too.

    Slate, March 27, 2003
    By Dahlia Lithwick

    Scalia on Gay Rights; Breyer on 17th-Century Poetry; and More on Oral Arguments in the Texas Sodomy Case

    The American Prospect (online edition), March 27, 2003
    By E. J. Graff

*********************************************************

Case Two The University of Michigan cases

  • Barbara Grutter, a caucasian female, is, and at all times relevant to this litigation was, a resident of the State of Michigan. She applied in 1996 for admission to the University of Michigan Law School (the "Law School") in the academic year 1997-98. After being placed on a "wait list," she was apprised by the Law School, by a letter dated June 25, 1997, that her application had been rejected. She has not attended any other law school, but still desires to attend the Law School and become a lawyer.

    Plaintiff brings this action as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a), 23(b), and 23(c)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of a class consisting of all students who:
    --applied for and were not granted admission to the Law School for all academic years since 1995-1998 through the entry of a judgment in this action or are ready and able to apply to the Law School; and
    --are members of those racial or ethnic groups, including Caucasian, that defendants have treated less favorably in considering their applications for admission to the Law School.

    A decison on this case is also expected in the summer.

Read the original complaint by clicking here
Follow the story and look at how the case developed and what happened below by clicking here

For those readers overseas who do not really understand what Affirmative Action is, here is something to help you by....Hope it's not biased.

Affirmative action is the nation’s most ambitious attempt to redress its long history of racial and sexual discrimination. But these days it seems to incite, rather than ease, the nation’s internal divisions.

An increasingly assertive opposition movement argues that the battle to guarantee equal rights for all citizens has been fought and won - and that favoring members of one group over another simply goes against the American grain.

But defenders of affirmative action say that the playing field is not yet level - and that granting modest advantages to minorities and women is more than fair, given hundreds of years of discrimination that benefited whites and men.

Born of the civil rights movement three decades ago, affirmative action calls for minorities and women to be given special consideration in employment, education and contracting decisions.

Institutions with affirmative action policies generally set goals and timetables for increased diversity - and use recruitment, set-asides and preference as ways of achieving those goals.

In its modern form, affirmative action can call for an admissions officer faced with two similarly qualified applicants to choose the minority over the white, or for a manager to recruit and hire a qualified woman for a job instead of a man. Affirmative action decisions are generally not supposed to be based on quotas, nor are they supposed to give any preference to unqualified candidates. And they are not supposed to harm anyone through “reverse discrimination.”

Former President Clinton, asserting that the job of ending discrimination remains unfinished, strongly defended affirmative action. “Mend it, but don't end it,” he said.

Conservatives, however, see ending affirmative action as a powerful political issue. Heartened by recent Supreme Court decisions that have limited affirmative action - and by the passage in 1996 of a California ballot initiative abolishing sexual and racial preferences - Republicans are taking up the battle wherever they can.

The debate over affirmative action takes on a particularly bitter tenor in the trenches. “Angry white men” blame affirmative action for robbing them of promotions and other opportunities. And while many minorities and women support affirmative action, a growing number say its benefits are no longer worth its side effect: the perception that their success is unearned.

Judging simply by the results, the playing field would appear to still be tilted very much in favor of white men. Overall, minorities and women are in vastly lower paying jobs and still face active discrimination in some sectors.

At this point in our nation’s history, does affirmative action make things better or worse? The debate rages on.


Thanks to all those who have supported us. We appreciate your help.
To support this site you can make a contribution in increments of $5 by clicking here.
Alternatively, You may purchase one or more of our 18 souvenirs from YADxpress below.





Shop YADxpress Today!

Stop by our store and pick up one or more of our eighteen different souvenirs. This is a way to keep us online. -- YADxpress




Website developed by Day's Strategies & Concepts International-A Service-Oriented Business        © 2003 The House of YAD